Hey there. I hope I'm not bothering you with this.
I have come to ask you for permission to mke one page out of the "Wade Adams" and "Unqiue". At the moment, Wade and Unique have a page each, which I do not think is a convenient solution. I am updating these pages, and I think it's very annoying having to always distinguish what exactely Wade did, and what Unqiue did. I think it would also be inconvenient for someone looking up information on Wade, since he will only find half the information on each point. The following might only be true for myself, but I view them as one character, and this think they should only have one article.
I personally agree and have thought the same for a while. It's one person we're talking about. I think the tricky part comes in what to call the final page. I think it should include both names. My first instinct was Wade "Unique" Adams, but I think that denigrates her identity as Unique.
I believe that we havent spoke before but we shall now!!!! I was wandering, im an active member of the Brochel Team (signing ppl, answering questions etc...) and i was wandering (becoz idk if i have to ask an admin) but i would like to add a slideshow to the bottom of the page because i have MANY photos that i would like to add and, if you read the poll, that is what people would like. Is that okay?
Hey i want you to read this... I think this person must be banned right now... This happened on chat...
So sorry our friendship had to end here and oh well good bye and make the best couple win(Brochel)
and thanks for bakstabning me
go suk dick and bye you bakstabing trash bi***
Hi, if you look at the next post on my wall, you'll see that it is being discussed. We are selective about what sources we allow because there have been a *lot* of believable but fake sources. We don't want to spread those even further and add to their credibility. That's why we only allow a few proven tumblr sources, actor/crew/news twitter, and legitimate news articles as sources.
However, with this source, over time it appears they are being proven to be correct. I can't make that decision on my own, however. I'm trying to discuss it with the other admins to make a definitive decision. Until we do, they aren't allowed. If we do make a change, it will be updated in the rules page.
I am turning to you because the Spam Team members are getting more and more hate from Users for not allowing the spoilers from this page (http://gleekoutbr.com/musicas-quartatemporada/) to be used as sources. They argue that the site got every song from "Glease" and "The Role You were Born To Play" right, which I can confirm to you.
I am turning to you with this since Spam Team members can't make such a descision and I trust you the most with it. I therefore wanted to ask you to check the page if you find some time in order to form an opinion if it makes an acceptable source or not, and to discuss it with the other Admins if neccesary. That would be a great help. =)
You know, I'm really not sure what to think about them. They've given out *tons* of info for a site that came out of nowhere. And the fact that they've deleted a lot of their stuff doesn't help their case and will make it difficult to confirm going forward. It also needs to be noted that a lot of these things can be edited later and make it appear that they said something before others. I don't *think* that's been the case here, as they've been followed very publicly. It does sound like they've gotten song stuff right. Sometimes that can be from other sources though. I just know people have been quick to assume other sources were true when they gave out info they wanted to hear, but they turned out to be bogus, and their only legit info mixed in came from other sources.
I'd like to believe they are legit, since many people seem to trust them. I like to err on the side of certainty though. I started editing at this wiki for one reason: I wanted to stop the spread of inaccurate information that was leading to so much wank all over fandom. I think it has definitely improved in the last year.
I admit that for the last month, I haven't been following fandom stuff as closely as I had been. (The Break-up kind of made me want to stop watching the show since the writers pissed me off so much, but I'm trying to keep a level head and wait for the show to return. Until then, I'm just doing my job here.) I'm trying to look over it more carefully, and look at others who have been convinced of their legitimacy. I welcome any other evidence people can provide.. I'm certainly open to allowing them if we can be more definitively convinced of their legitimacy.
Glee Forum has a spoilers only thread where you can compare what we've learned from Gleek Out Brazil and the dates that these spoilers have been confirmed through other sources like Ryan Murphy's twitter. There has been a lot of discussion about this there. It's obvious they have a mole on set or connected with the show. While like other sources such as E! and TVLine, they have fan biases, gleekoutbr have also provided concrete, provable spoilers. Far more over the last months than either traditional sources or GW approved tumblrs like wishyyouwould or greyang.
Hey There - I wanted to just get in touch with you about videos on this wiki. I noticed glee uses a lot of videos and wanted to ask some feedback on videos on your wiki. Why the community likes to add them? What other types of videos you would like to see? What Wikia has done well? And what else you would like to see in relation to video on Wikia? Thanks in advance!
Got a cold. I wasn't at the listening party since I don't like to hear songs before the show (and it was before I got home from work). I did break down and listen to It's Time though. Also, I watched all the in-between bits. I'll be on chat in a bit. Too hard to do my duplicate checking and be on chat at the same time. Almost done with actors.